Denne artikel vil behandle emnet Brugerdiskussion:Lopezsuarez, som i øjeblikket har skabt stor interesse på grund af dets mange implikationer på forskellige områder. Brugerdiskussion:Lopezsuarez har været genstand for undersøgelse og forskning af eksperter inden for forskellige discipliner, som har søgt grundigt at forstå dets karakteristika, dets indvirkning og dets relevans i samfundet. Fra sin oprindelse til sin udvikling i dag har Brugerdiskussion:Lopezsuarez udløst debatter og refleksioner omkring sin indflydelse på kultur, økonomi, politik, teknologi, miljø og andre grundlæggende aspekter af menneskelivet. Denne artikel har til formål at præsentere et omfattende og opdateret syn på Brugerdiskussion:Lopezsuarez, der udforsker dets mange facetter og dets betydning i den moderne verden.
Hjerteligt velkommen til den danske Wikipedia, Lopezsuarez! (![]()
|
Hi Lopezsuarez. If you are creating stub articles about Spanish municipalities, please use these headings:
== Referencer == {{Reflist}} == Eksterne henvisninger == {{Commonscat|<name>}} * {{officiel hjemmeside}}
Kartebolle (Dipsacus fullonum) (diskussion) 19. nov. 2024, 10:54 (CET)
Der skal være kilder i de artikler, du opretter. Og en artikel som Capileira indeholder ikke andet end geografisk placering og indbyggertal. Skriv indhold i artiklerne, så det er klart, hvorfor de er relevante for Wikipedia. --Madglad (diskussion) 9. dec. 2024, 06:10 (CET)
Hello and merry Christmas! Why did you move the page A Coruña (provins) to La Coruña (provins)? As I understand it, “A Coruña” is the name of the province in Galician which is the official language (along with Spanish). Most Wikipedia articles use “A Coruña”. Kartebolle (Dipsacus fullonum) (diskussion) 25. dec. 2024, 18:10 (CET)
Same question for Gerona / Girona in Catalonia and others. --Kartebolle (Dipsacus fullonum) (diskussion) 25. dec. 2024, 18:17 (CET)
Hello. I have noticed that you have changed the content of the article Ceuta without providing an edit summary. There are some problems involved in that edit. Apart from potential language problems, material which is potentially controversial should never be included without providing reliable sources. In addition, it is necessary that you provide an edit summary explaining properly the contents of your edits, in particular when they may be controversial, like changing the language of geographical names or adding material to accounts of historical conflicts. Also, it's better to discuss any potentially controversial edit on the talk page first. Normally you can do so in English on the Danish wiki site. Økonom (diskussion) 27. dec. 2024, 09:39 (CET)
I have reverted your edit to Lois Pereiro. You have been asked before here on your talk page to be cautious and ask for consensus before making potentially controversial edits, and always provide proper edit summaries, so that other editors can be properly informed about the contents of your changes. Changing or deleting information about regional languages, identities, etc., or changing names from one language to another, are potentially controversial, and you should not make such edits without seeking consensus on the relevant article talk pages, or possibly in some other forum if your desired changes follow some kind of general principle. If you continue making controversial changes and/or without announcing your edits, you may be blocked from further editing. If you have any comments to this, please answer here on your own talk page. Økonom (diskussion) 30. dec. 2024, 15:44 (CET)